Skeptics run around in circles, and make themselves look silly, trying to deny the existence of UFOs.
proof for UFOs:
-historical accounts going back to prehistory
-descriptions of similar flying or floating objects from completely disconnected sources in history
-video footage from more than 2 different angles of the same UFO in a particular area
-a video taken by the mexican military of a UFO from a plane, hence:
-the mexican governments admitting to at least one UFO's existence
-eye-witness reports from people who share absolutely no connection in a given area, with:
-consistency in description from people who are no UFO-heads
How does the UFO-skeptic even know his mother is indeed his genetic mother? Are there pictures? Well I say they were faked. Are there eye-witness accounts? Well clearly those people are family, and the doctors are in cahoots. Are there records of his mother and father copulating? That is clearly the product of someone's imagination.
The skeptic ought to consider what his standard of proof is. If he denies UFOs, then he ought to call up his mother and ask for some hard evidence.
The skeptic ought to consider what his standard of proof is. If he denies UFOs, then he ought to call up his mother and ask for some hard evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment